One of the largest crypto fraud in recent years has resulted in a conviction in the United States, highlighting the scope and complexity of modern digital financial crime.
Chinese national Jingliang Su was sentenced to 46 months in prison, as well as to pay $26.9 million in restitution, for his participation in an international scheme to defraud American investors through fake cryptocurrency platforms.
The decision was issued on January 27, 2026, by a federal court, marking a significant success for US authorities against global financial fraud networks.
See also: Protecting digital assets: Crypto security
Tens of millions in losses
The criminal enterprise had a serious financial impact. According to court documents, 174 victims in the US were defrauded, losing a total of $36.9 million.
The investments that supposedly involved digital asset purchases never existed. The funds were transferred directly to accounts controlled by the circuit, without any actual trading activity.
Many of the victims had little experience in the crypto space, a fact that the perpetrators took full advantage of.
How the international fraud operation was set up
The base of operations was located in Cambodia, where organized fraud centers operated with personnel, technical infrastructure, and a clear division of roles.
Su and his accomplices exploited:
- social networks
- messaging apps
- phone calls
- online dating platforms
through which they approached potential victims and gradually built a relationship of trust. When they were ready, they promoted investment “opportunities” in digital assets.
See also: Crypto theft attacks linked to LastPass breach in 2022
Fake platforms that imitated well-known exchanges
Central to the scheme were fake websites designed to resemble legitimate cryptocurrency exchange platforms.
The websites displayed:
- fake profit charts
- non-existent account balances
- fake transaction confirmations
Thus, the victims believed that their investments were growing, while in reality their money had already been lost.
🔒 Protect your privacy with Proton VPN
Swiss VPN from the creators of Proton Mail — strict no-logs policy, strong encryption, and built-in NetShield that blocks ads, trackers, & malware.
- ✔ No-logs, based in Switzerland (except 14-Eyes)
- ✔ NetShield: blocks ads, trackers & malicious domains
- ✔ Covers all devices — free version available
The link is an affiliate link — SecNews may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. It does not affect the independence of our article writing.
The "heart" of the fraud: Money laundering via crypto
The most disturbing element of the case was the sophisticated money laundering infrastructure that Su had organized.
Initially, the victims' funds ended up in front company bank accounts. Then, $36.9 million was concentrated in a single account at Deltec Bank in the Bahamas.
From there, the amount was converted into Tether (USDT) — a stablecoin pegged to the dollar — allowing:
- fast cross-border transport
- avoidance of bank control
- more difficult to trace
The crypto was eventually sent to digital wallets in Cambodia and distributed throughout Southeast Asia.
See also: 2025: Hackers stole 2.7 billion in crypto
International cooperation for network disruption
The revelation of the case was made possible thanks to multi-level cooperation between:
- US Secret Service
- Internal Security Service
- Customs and Border Protection
- Ministry of Justice
Authorities were able to trace the flow of money within the blockchain and link digital wallets to individuals.
Message to international circles
Su had pleaded guilty in June 2025 to conspiracy and operating an unlicensed money transmission, acknowledging his pivotal role in the financial leg of the fraud.
To date, eight accomplices have also pleaded guilty, with sentences ranging from 36 to 51 months in prison.
The case sends a clear message: crypto may offer speed and anonymity, but it is no longer outside the purview of international justice.
In a world where the digital economy is growing at an explosive pace, the Su case is a reminder that technology can be a tool for innovation — or a weapon of crime, depending on who wields it.
